Who it's for
  • NZTA Waka Kotahi
  • Local councils
  • Developers
  • Infrastructure & alliance partners

The problem we solve

An investment decision needs an economic case that holds — the right benefits monetised the right way, sensitivity-tested, and consistent with the business case around it. A BCR built on shaky inputs gets unpicked at investment review, and takes the funding case down with it.

TTAP prepares the economic case to NZTA's Monetised Benefits and Costs Manual: benefits framed against the problem, monetised on defensible inputs, appraised and tested, and reported so an investment decision-maker can rely on it.

What's included

  • Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) analysis
  • Monetised benefits & costs (MBCM)
  • Travel-time & reliability assessment
  • Multi-criteria analysis (MCA)
  • Sensitivity & risk analysis
  • Economic case preparation

What you get

  • BCR and economic appraisal to NZTA MBCM
  • Monetised benefit and cost estimates
  • Travel-time, reliability and safety benefit assessment
  • Multi-criteria analysis (MCA)
  • Sensitivity and risk testing
  • Economic case for business cases at all stages

How we work

  1. 01

    Frame the benefits

    We tie the benefits to the problem and the business case so the economics and the narrative are one story.

  2. 02

    Monetise

    We monetise benefits and costs on NZTA MBCM inputs — travel time, reliability, safety, vehicle operating costs and more.

  3. 03

    Appraise & test

    We compute the BCR, run sensitivity and risk analysis, and stress the result against its key assumptions.

  4. 04

    Report the economic case

    We report the economic case in NZTA's format so it's ready for investment review.

Standards

  • NZTA Monetised Benefits and Costs Manual (MBCM)
  • NZTA Business Case Approach
  • Treasury CBAx (where applicable)

Tools

  • NZTA appraisal worksheets
  • Multi-criteria analysis (MCA)
  • Sensitivity & risk analysis

Relevant projects

Frequently asked

What BCR do I need for funding?

There's no single threshold — NZTA weighs the BCR alongside strategic fit and the GPS priorities. What matters is that the BCR is built on defensible MBCM inputs and is honest about its sensitivities; an over-claimed BCR hurts the case more than a modest, robust one.

Can you do the economics for a business case you're not writing?

Yes — we provide the economic case as a standalone input to a business case another party is leading, using NZTA's appraisal framework so it slots in cleanly.

Do you cover multi-criteria analysis as well as BCR?

Yes. Where benefits aren't easily monetised, MCA sits alongside the BCR to give decision-makers a structured, transparent comparison of the options.